<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Onfolio - performance</title>
	<atom:link href="http://starrenburgs.com/blog/2005/02/16/onfolio-performance/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://starrenburgs.com/blog/2005/02/16/onfolio-performance/</link>
	<description>Perspectives and musings on technology, trends and the world.</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 14:22:58 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Patrick</title>
		<link>http://starrenburgs.com/blog/2005/02/16/onfolio-performance/#comment-34</link>
		<dc:creator>Patrick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Apr 2005 18:21:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.starrenburgs.com/?p=19#comment-34</guid>
		<description>Joe

We actually use TrendMicro OfficeScan desktop anti-virus at work. I will see if adding the .cfs file extension (if possible in OfficeScan) makes any difference.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Joe</p>
<p>We actually use TrendMicro OfficeScan desktop anti-virus at work. I will see if adding the .cfs file extension (if possible in OfficeScan) makes any difference.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe Cheng</title>
		<link>http://starrenburgs.com/blog/2005/02/16/onfolio-performance/#comment-25</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe Cheng</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Apr 2005 04:59:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.starrenburgs.com/?p=19#comment-25</guid>
		<description>In case you haven't already worked through this with our support folks, I'm guessing you've got Norton Anti-Virus at work. If you add the .cfs extension to the NAV exclusion list, you should see the performance problems disappear.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In case you haven&#8217;t already worked through this with our support folks, I&#8217;m guessing you&#8217;ve got Norton Anti-Virus at work. If you add the .cfs extension to the NAV exclusion list, you should see the performance problems disappear.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Firefox</title>
		<link>http://starrenburgs.com/blog/2005/02/16/onfolio-performance/#comment-23</link>
		<dc:creator>Firefox</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Apr 2005 17:00:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.starrenburgs.com/?p=19#comment-23</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Onfolio Performance Issues&lt;/strong&gt;

I'm seeing lots of positive comments on Onfolio, but one problem may be performance:...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Onfolio Performance Issues</strong></p>
<p>I&#8217;m seeing lots of positive comments on Onfolio, but one problem may be performance:&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charles Teague</title>
		<link>http://starrenburgs.com/blog/2005/02/16/onfolio-performance/#comment-14</link>
		<dc:creator>Charles Teague</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Feb 2005 01:39:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.starrenburgs.com/?p=19#comment-14</guid>
		<description>Thanks Patrick- any information that you provide is very much appreciated!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Patrick- any information that you provide is very much appreciated!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patrick</title>
		<link>http://starrenburgs.com/blog/2005/02/16/onfolio-performance/#comment-10</link>
		<dc:creator>Patrick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Feb 2005 22:09:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.starrenburgs.com/?p=19#comment-10</guid>
		<description>Hi Charles

I am using Preview Release (6557). It was actually my work machine which had the problem, my home machine is an Athlon 64 with 1GB RAM, it's sweet :-) I'll try it again on my work computer - P4 512MB - to see how it goes and see if I can pin down what the issue was and whether it was clashing with anything.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Charles</p>
<p>I am using Preview Release (6557). It was actually my work machine which had the problem, my home machine is an Athlon 64 with 1GB RAM, it&#8217;s sweet <img src='http://starrenburgs.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> I&#8217;ll try it again on my work computer - P4 512MB - to see how it goes and see if I can pin down what the issue was and whether it was clashing with anything.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charles Teague</title>
		<link>http://starrenburgs.com/blog/2005/02/16/onfolio-performance/#comment-9</link>
		<dc:creator>Charles Teague</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Feb 2005 21:59:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.starrenburgs.com/?p=19#comment-9</guid>
		<description>Hi Patrick

I'm a developer at Onfolio- just wanted to check if you had tried the Preview release of Onfolio yet.  We have had a lof of positive feedback about its performance compared to Beta 1, so if you haven't checked it out yet, it may make performance on your home computer a lot more acceptable.  If you're already using it and its still not working for you performance wise, thats good for us to know as well- we'll keep trying to make it faster!

Charles Teague</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Patrick</p>
<p>I&#8217;m a developer at Onfolio- just wanted to check if you had tried the Preview release of Onfolio yet.  We have had a lof of positive feedback about its performance compared to Beta 1, so if you haven&#8217;t checked it out yet, it may make performance on your home computer a lot more acceptable.  If you&#8217;re already using it and its still not working for you performance wise, thats good for us to know as well- we&#8217;ll keep trying to make it faster!</p>
<p>Charles Teague</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
